Fix leaks in requests
Review Request #2300 — Created Feb. 28, 2023 and submitted
Fixes a leak for images in requests:
3,627 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 35,636 of 36,499 at 0x484386F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:393) by 0x4980168: g_malloc (gmem.c:130) by 0x4995723: UnknownInlinedFun (gstrfuncs.c:426) by 0x4995723: g_memdup2 (gstrfuncs.c:419) by 0x4D3E534: purple_request_field_image_new (request.c:1677) by 0x1CA970B1: purple_demo_protocol_request_fields_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:553) by 0x4DB5FBF: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:832) by 0x4DE3D85: signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 (gsignal.c:3796) by 0x4DD3419: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:3549) by 0x4DD3632: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3606) by 0x581C784: g_simple_action_activate (gsimpleaction.c:227) by 0x581B132: g_action_activate (gaction.c:399) by 0x51221B6: UnknownInlinedFun (gtkmenutrackeritem.c:842) by 0x51221B6: gtk_popover_item_activate.lto_priv.0 (gtkmenusectionbox.c:200)
and leak of the GObject wrapper for request fields:
4 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 713 of 36,499 at 0x484386F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:393) by 0x4980168: g_malloc (gmem.c:130) by 0x4995602: g_strdup (gstrfuncs.c:363) by 0x488B324: create_list_field (gtkrequest.c:1504) by 0x488D1D7: pidgin_request_fields (gtkrequest.c:2160) by 0x4D3FFB8: purple_request_fields (request.c:2283) by 0x1CA971D6: purple_demo_protocol_request_fields_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:562) by 0x4DB5FBF: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:832) by 0x4DE3D85: signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 (gsignal.c:3796) by 0x4DD3419: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:3549) by 0x4DD3632: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3606) by 0x581C784: g_simple_action_activate (gsimpleaction.c:227) 56 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 19,209 of 36,499 at 0x48486AF: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1451) by 0x498071F: g_realloc (gmem.c:201) by 0x49592C4: g_data_set_internal (gdataset.c:474) by 0x488B347: create_list_field (gtkrequest.c:1504) by 0x488D1D7: pidgin_request_fields (gtkrequest.c:2160) by 0x4D3FFB8: purple_request_fields (request.c:2283) by 0x1CA971D6: purple_demo_protocol_request_fields_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:562) by 0x4DB5FBF: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:832) by 0x4DE3D85: signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 (gsignal.c:3796) by 0x4DD3419: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:3549) by 0x4DD3632: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3606) by 0x581C784: g_simple_action_activate (gsimpleaction.c:227) 614 (192 direct, 422 indirect) bytes in 8 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 33,122 of 36,499 at 0x484386F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:393) by 0x4980168: g_malloc (gmem.c:130) by 0x4997AB5: g_slice_alloc (gslice.c:1074) by 0x49980EC: g_slice_alloc0 (gslice.c:1100) by 0x4DDF04B: g_type_create_instance (gtype.c:1913) by 0x4DC4C1F: g_object_new_internal (gobject.c:2228) by 0x4DC6247: g_object_new_with_properties (gobject.c:2391) by 0x4DC6FF0: g_object_new (gobject.c:2037) by 0x488B2D5: create_list_field (gtkrequest.c:1499) by 0x488D1D7: pidgin_request_fields (gtkrequest.c:2160) by 0x4D3FFB8: purple_request_fields (request.c:2283) by 0x1CA971D6: purple_demo_protocol_request_fields_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:562)
and a request label:
128 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 27,735 of 36,499 at 0x484378A: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:392) by 0x484870B: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:1451) by 0x498071F: g_realloc (gmem.c:201) by 0x499A343: g_string_maybe_expand (gstring.c:92) by 0x499A3BF: g_string_sized_new (gstring.c:116) by 0x4981BCB: g_markup_escape_text (gmarkup.c:2323) by 0x4887D8A: pidgin_request_escape (gtkrequest.c:360) by 0x488CED9: pidgin_request_fields (gtkrequest.c:2105) by 0x4D3FFB8: purple_request_fields (request.c:2283) by 0x1CA971D6: purple_demo_protocol_request_fields_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:562) by 0x4DB5FBF: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:832) by 0x4DE3D85: signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 (gsignal.c:3796)
and one in the demo protocol:
40 bytes in 1 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 15,277 of 36,499 at 0x484386F: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:393) by 0x4AE3017: __vasprintf_internal (vasprintf.c:71) by 0x49C2E81: UnknownInlinedFun (stdio2.h:169) by 0x49C2E81: g_vasprintf (gprintf.c:340) by 0x4998EA0: g_strdup_vprintf (gstrfuncs.c:553) by 0x4998F5C: g_strdup_printf (gstrfuncs.c:583) by 0x1CA9584E: purple_demo_protocol_request_input_activate (purpledemoprotocolactions.c:203) by 0x4DB5FBF: g_closure_invoke (gclosure.c:832) by 0x4DE3D85: signal_emit_unlocked_R.isra.0 (gsignal.c:3796) by 0x4DD3419: g_signal_emit_valist (gsignal.c:3549) by 0x4DD3632: g_signal_emit (gsignal.c:3606) by 0x581C784: g_simple_action_activate (gsimpleaction.c:227) by 0x581B132: g_action_activate (gaction.c:399)
Ran valgrind and confirmed above leaks were not there after opening Request Input and Request Fields.
Summary | ID |
---|---|
170b58fb3503ae19fb2e0178a38f4f3f2a863ac5 |